Information on the Submission of the Research Ethics Proposal
All students of the Islands and Small States Institute (ISSI) are required to follow the procedure below and submit the relevant form to the Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy Research Ethics Committee (FEMA FREC)
*Note*There is a fullreplicaof the form which can be downloaded. Use this to become familiar with the format and requirements before beginning your application.
The form on URECA guides applicants through 3 parts:
Part 1: Applicant and project details
Part 2: Self-assessment & detailed evaluation
Part 3: Submission details
In part 2, the detailed evaluation questions will be shownonlyto applicants who flag an issue in the self-assessment checklist. In such cases, applicants must elaborate on the issue flagged and seek FREC permission prior to data collection. In all other cases, once the form reaches the FREC for filing and audit purposes, the researcher may commence research directly.
In case ofre-submissions, applicants are towrite their previous reference number/unique ID. Every time a new re-submission is submitted, a new unique ID is created.
A list of theattachmentsthat need to accompany the online form is available on the URECA form itself. The ones relevant to the research must be included in the required areas of the form.
The supervisor will automatically receive a copy of the submitted form and is to ENDORSE the URECA form and all attachments.For FREC to process the application,the Principal Supervisor needs to ENDORSEthat the form and attachments reflect the contents of the research proposal, which abides by theUniversity of Malta Research Code of Practice.
When URECA alerts the supervisor that a form requires endorsement, the supervisor can either click on the link provided in the email or else access the URECA platform from the base address and go to the section "Forms requiring endorsement". The forms therein can be opened as read-only, and the attachments downloaded. The supervisor can then endorse the form or send the form back to the student, and can include a message justifying the action.
Consent forms should reflect the requirements indicated inSection 3.1.3 of theUniversity of Malta Research Code of Practice.
All attachments should be inPDF form.
As indicated in theResearch Ethics Review Proceduressupervisorsareresponsible for the documents they endorse. Supervisors should ensure the URECA form and related materialsare up to standard before forwarding their approval. This includes proper use of English and Maltese without grammatical errors and typos.
The following are the scheduled FREC meeting dates. In order for your submission to be considered in any one of these dates, it should be sent up toseven daysbefore the meetings.
14 October 2021
11 November 2021
9 December 2021
13 January 2022
9 February 2022
9 March 2022
6 April 2022
4 May 2022
8 June 2022
6 July 2022
7 September 2022
Forms will be accepted till one minute before midnight (23:59) up to seven days before the dates indicated.The supervisor’s endorsement is to reach the FEMA FREC by the given deadlines otherwise it will be considered as a late submission. Late submissions will be reviewed in subsequent FREC meetings.
When the digital form is marked as‘For FREC Review’, applicants shallwait for ethical approval before starting the data collection.
It is not correct for researchers to state that UREC has reviewed/approved their study.UREC encourages theuse of the following statementor something similar as this is general and covers all cases including those where no FREC review is necessary:'This research is in conformity with the University of Malta’s Research Code of Practice and Research Ethics Review Procedures.'
Infringements of regulations and/or policies concerning ethics and data protection are matter for disciplinary action.
For any questions regarding any issue/s related to FREC please contact usONLYviaemail.
Important note:
When the digital form is marked as‘For FREC Review’, applicants shallwait for ethical approval before starting the data collection.
It is not correct for researchers to state that UREC has reviewed/approved their study.UREC encourages theuse of the following statementor something similar as this is general and covers all cases including those where no FREC review is necessary:'This research is in conformity with the University of Malta’s Research Code of Practice and Research Ethics Review Procedures.'
Infringements of regulations and/or policies concerning ethics and data protection are matter for disciplinary action.
For any questions regarding any issue/s related to FREC please contact usONLYviaemail.