Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100419
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Albukhanajer, Wissam A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jin, Yaochu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Briffa, Johann A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Godfried | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-08T10:38:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-08T10:38:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Albukhanajer, W. A., Jin, Y., Briffa, J. A., & Williams, G. (2013, March). A comparative study of multi-objective evolutionary trace transform methods for robust feature extraction. In International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Sheffield, UK. 573-586. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100419 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Recently, Evolutionary Trace Transform (ETT) has been developed to extract efficient features (called triple features) for invariant image identification using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. This paper compares two methods of Evolutionary Trace Transform (method I and II) evolved through similar objectives by minimizing the within class variance (Sw) and maximizing the between-class variance (Sb) of image features. However, each solution on the Pareto front of method I represents one triple features (i.e. 1D) to be combined with another solution to construct 2D feature space, whereas each solution on the Pareto front of method II represents a complete pair of triple features (i.e. 2D). Experimental results show that both methods are able to produce stable and consistent features. Moreover, method II has denser solutions distributed in the convex region of the Pareto front than in method I. Nevertheless, method II takes longer time to evolve than method I. Although the Trace transforms are evolved offline on one set of low resolution (64 ×64) images, they can be applied to extract features from various standard 256×256 images. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Identification | en_GB |
dc.subject | Digital images | en_GB |
dc.subject | Algorithms | en_GB |
dc.subject | Robust optimization | en_GB |
dc.title | A comparative study of multi-objective evolutionary trace transform methods for robust feature extraction | en_GB |
dc.type | conferenceObject | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization | en_GB |
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Sheffield, UK, March 2013 | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-642-37140-0_43 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacICTCCE |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A_comparative_study_of_multi_objective_evolutionary_trace_transform_methods_for_robust_feature_extraction_2013.pdf Restricted Access | 805.75 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.