Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100560
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Camilleri, Annelise | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gatt, Alfred | - |
dc.contributor.author | Formosa, Cynthia | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-11T10:30:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-11T10:30:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Camilleri, A., Gatt, A., & Formosa, C. (2020). Inter-rater reliability of four validated diabetic foot ulcer classification systems. Journal of Tissue Viability, 29(4), 284-290. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100560 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The need to classify, score and describe diabetic foot ulcerations is needed for accurate clinical documentation. An agreed wound classification can improve communication between health care professionals, and improve ease of discussion regarding potential outcomes. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability between four validated wound classification systems. | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Research design and method: A prospective non-experimental comparative study was conducted. Forty patients with diabetes presenting with a new or long-standing ulceration were recruited. Each ulcer was graded/scored by three clinicians using four widely used classification systems; namely the University of Texas, SINBAD, Meggitt- Wagner and the PEDIS scoring systems. | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Results: All classifications had a satisfactory inter-rater agreement when evaluated by three raters of various clinical experience, however, the strength of the agreement varied between classifications. The Meggitt-Wagner system had an almost perfect agreement, the SINBAD and UT systems had a strong inter-rater agreement whilst the PEDIS had a moderate inter-rater agreement. | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Conclusion: Results of study serve as assurance and provides the evidence that these systems may be reliably used by different clinicians, even those with varied experience in wound care. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Diabetes -- Treatment -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Foot -- Ulcers -- Malta -- Case studies | en_GB |
dc.subject | Diabetes -- Complications -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Wounds and injuries -- Treatment -- Classification | en_GB |
dc.title | Inter-rater reliability of four validated diabetic foot ulcer classification systems | en_GB |
dc.type | article | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.09.002 | - |
dc.publication.title | Journal of Tissue Viability | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacHScPod |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Inter rater reliability of four validated diabetic foot ulcer classification systems 2020.pdf Restricted Access | 379.91 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.