Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101297
Title: Comparing standard wound care vs standard wound care with adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy : a clinical trial
Other Titles: P86 Comparing standard wound care vs standard wound care with adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy : a clinical trial
Authors: Formosa, Cynthia
Perren, Sarah
Keywords: Foot -- Ulcers -- Treatment
Foot -- Ulcers -- Case studies
Hyperbaric oxygenation
Diabetic foot -- Complications
Type 2 diabetes -- Treatment
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Formosa, C., & Perren, S. (2018). Comparing standard wound care vs standard wound care with adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a clinical trial. Diabetic Medicine, 35 (Suppl. 1). 64.
Abstract: Aim: To compare standard wound care vs standard wound care with adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic arterial foot ulceration. Methods: A quasi-experimental, matched-control clinical trial was conducted. Twenty-six participants living with Type 2 diabetes and presenting with a newly diagnosed arterial foot ulcer were recruited. Subjects were divided into two groups. Group A underwent standard wound care with adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy and group B underwent standard wound care only. Following application of treatment, participants were reviewed every week for a period of four weeks and their ulcers were measured for their surface area and depth to assess any change in wound size. [Excerpt]
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101297
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScPod



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.