Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101397
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFormosa, L. M.-
dc.contributor.authorMallia, Bertram-
dc.contributor.authorCamilleri, Josette-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-02T09:09:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-02T09:09:48Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationFormosa, L. M., Mallia, B., & Camilleri, J. (2014). Push‐out bond strength of MTA with antiwashout gel or resins. International endodontic journal, 47(5), 454-462.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101397-
dc.description.abstractAim: Assessment of the push-out bond strength of four MTA-based formulations for use as root-end filling materials. Methodology: MTA Plus mixed with (i) water (‘MTA-W’); (ii) a proprietary water-based antiwashout gel (‘MTA-AW’); (iii) Superbond C&B chemically curing resin (‘MTA-Chem’); and (iv) Heliobond light-curing resin (‘MTA-Light’) was tested. Root slices 3 mm thick human had a 1.5 mm diameter hole drilled centrally and were treated with 17% EDTA for 60s. Forty specimens divided into groups 1–4 were prepared and filled with MTA-W, MTA-AW, MTA-Chem and MTA-Light, respectively. Groups 3 and 4 were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 60s, and bonding agent was applied to the dentine surface. Specimens were stored for 28 days in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution at 37 °C. Push-out strength was tested with a punch and die (punch diameter 1.3 mm, die diameter 2.0 mm, punch speed 1 mm min1). Stereomicroscopy was used to classify failure mode (adhesive, cohesive or mixed type). Results: The resulting push-out strengths were 5.1 MPa (MTA-W), 4.3 MPa (MTA-AW), 4.7 MPa (MTA-Chem) and 11.0 MPa (MTA-Light). MTA-W had higher push-out strength than MTA-AW (P = 0.022). The same was noted for MTA-Light relative to the other materials (P < 0.05). All materials exhibited adequate push-out strengths compared with MTA-W. Failure was predominantly mixed, except for MTA-Chem (predominantly adhesive). Conclusions: All materials exhibited adequate push-out strength. Previous studies have shown the new formulations have additional advantages including increased washout resistance and faster setting time, making them promising for future dental applications.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltden_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBondsen_GB
dc.subjectGums and resins -- Analysisen_GB
dc.subjectAggregates (Building materials)en_GB
dc.subjectFillings (Dentistry)en_GB
dc.titlePush-out bond strength of MTA with antiwashout gel or resinsen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holderen_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/iej.12169-
dc.publication.titleInternational endodontic journalen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacEngMME

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Push‐out_bond_strength_of_MTA_with_antiwashout_gel_or_resins.pdf310.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.