Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/102949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jun Ho-
dc.contributor.authorArita, Emiko Saito-
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Lucas Rodrigues-
dc.contributor.authorYoshimoto, Marcelo-
dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, Plauto Christopher Aranha-
dc.contributor.authorCortes, Arthur R. G.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-24T10:21:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-24T10:21:32Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationKim, J. H., Arita, E. S., Pinheiro, L. R., Yoshimoto, M., Watanabe, P. C. A., & Cortes, A. R. G. (2018). Computed tomographic artifacts in maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 29(1), e78-e80.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/102949-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The present study aimed to present 4 cases and to undertake a systematic review on the current knowledge of the impact of cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) artifacts on oral and maxillofacial surgical planning and follow-up. Methods: The MEDLINE (PubMed) database was searched for the period from February 2004 to February 2017, for studies on the impact of CBCT artifacts on surgical planning of oral and maxillofacial surgeries. The PRISMA statement was followed during data assessment and extraction. As a result, data extraction included information regarding: the use of CBCT to plan or follow-up oral and maxillofacial surgeries, presence and type identification of a CBCT artifact, and details on the impact of artifacts on image quality and/or surgical planning. Four cases were selected to illustrate the topic. Results: The search strategy yielded 408 publications in MEDLINE (PubMed). An initial screening of the publications was performed using abstracts and key words. After application of exclusion criteria, a total of 11 studies were finally identified as eligible to be discussed. Studies revealed 3 main types of artifact: beam hardening, streak, and motion artifacts. Most of the studies suggest that artifacts significantly affect oral and maxillofacial surgical planning and follow-up, despite of allowing for identification of metal projectiles in cases of maxillofacial trauma. Conclusion: CBCT artifacts have a significant impact on oral and maxillofacial surgical planning and follow-up.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWolter Kluweren_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectMaxilla -- Surgery -- Planningen_GB
dc.subjectMaxilla -- Surgery -- Case studiesen_GB
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomographyen_GB
dc.titleComputed tomographic artifacts in maxillofacial surgeryen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000004088-
dc.publication.titleJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacDenDS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Computed tomographic artifacts in maxillofacial surgery 2018.pdf
  Restricted Access
166.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.