Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/104878
Title: | Mathematical modeling of auxetic systems : bridging the gap between analytical models and observation |
Authors: | Grima Delia Spiteri Cornish, James-Nicholas Grima, Joseph N. Attard, Daphne |
Keywords: | Auxetics (Materials) Metamaterials -- Mathematical models Metamaterials -- Mechanical properties Strains and stresses -- Mathematical models Poisson processes |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Publisher: | SpringerOpen |
Citation: | Grima-Cornish, J. N., Grima, J. N., & Attard, D. (2021). Mathematical modeling of auxetic systems: bridging the gap between analytical models and observation. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 16(1), 1-22. |
Abstract: | The Poisson’s ratio, a property which quantifies the changes in thickness when a material is stretched and compressed, can be determined as the negative of the transverse strain over the applied strain. In the scientific literature, there are various ways how strain may be defined and the actual definition used could result in a different Poisson’s ratio being computed. This paper will look in more detail at this by comparing the more commonly used forms of strain and the Poisson’s ratio that is computable from them. More specifically, an attempt is made to assess through examples on the usefulness of the various formulations to properly describe what can actually be observed, thus providing a clearer picture of which form of Poisson’s ratio should be used in analytical modelling. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/104878 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacSciMet |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical modeling of auxetic systems bridging the gap between analytical models and observation 2021.pdf | 3.01 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.