Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105111
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarasani, Klejda-
dc.contributor.authorConlon, Neil T.-
dc.contributor.authorDarmanin, Stephanie-
dc.contributor.authorČelebić, Aleksandar-
dc.contributor.authorKubelac, Milan Paul-
dc.contributor.authorLala, Amelja-
dc.contributor.authorCalleja-Agius, Jean-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T10:02:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-12T10:02:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationHarasani, K., Conlon, N. T., Darmanin, S., Čelebić, A., Kubelac, M. P., Lala, A. & Calleja-Agius, J. (2022). Rapid systematic review of clinical trials on pharmacological therapies for rare gynecological cancers. Annals of Research in Oncology, 2(4), 246-258.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105111-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to systematically review clinical trials on pharmacological therapies for rare gynecological cancers and analyze their characteristics. The PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed and two databases were searched (WHO´s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and clinicaltrials.gov). The Jadad score was used to assess the methodological quality of completed clinical trials. A total of 212 records, covering trials from 1993 to 2022, were included in the final review. More than half were phase II trials (110; 51.89%) and the status of recruiting was mainly completed (80; 37.74%). There were 26 (12.26%) terminated or withdrawn clinical trials. Just 42.45% of the trials were specific only for rare types of gynecological cancers. The most common type of investigated therapy was chemotherapy (89; 41.98%), followed by targeted therapy (64; 30.19%) and a combination of therapies (23.11%). However, in the last five years there was an increase in trials investigating targeted therapies such as immunotherapy, overgrowth-related and angiogenesis-related therapies. All completed trials except one, had a Jadad score 0-2, indicating low-quality. Thirty-six (45.00%) completed clinical trials had neither posted results, nor publications. Higher quality clinical trials with better reporting of results are needed for rare gynecological cancers.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectRare Diseasesen_GB
dc.subjectGenerative organs -- Canceren_GB
dc.subjectChemotherapyen_GB
dc.subjectImmunotherapyen_GB
dc.titleRapid systematic review of clinical trials on pharmacological therapies for rare gynecological cancersen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.48286/aro.2022.57-
dc.publication.titleAnnals of Research in Oncologyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.