Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105532
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T14:17:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-24T14:17:53Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationCamilleri, I. (2022). Coastal state regulation of innocent passage: a comparative study (Bachelor's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105532-
dc.descriptionLL.B.(Hons)(Melit.)en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis Dissertation examines different provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which relate to innocent passage and how they are interpreted by different coastal States. This work will refer to the historical developments which led to the formation of UNCLOS and then moves on to examine the two words innocent and passage in order to understand what the doctrine of innocent passage entails. This is followed by a comparison of different State practice and interpretation of different UNCLOS provisions, namely article 19(2)(l) and article 21(1) in relation to the adoption of State domestic legislation according to UNCLOS, article 23 in relation to nuclear powered ships and article 29 to 32 in relation to warships. The dissertation will show how the provisions of UNCLOS relating to the innocent passage of foreign vessels in a coastal State’s territorial sea have been enforced by different States in varying degrees which, at times, creates direct resistance to the Convention’s provisions. Such resistance is clearly ascertainable in China’s insistence that warships cannot pass through its territorial sea without prior notification and authorisation. Similarly, New Zealand’s adoption of the ‘Nuclear Free Zone’ and its restrictions against allowing foreign warships passage through its territorial sea unless the New Zealand Prime Minister is convinced that such vessels are not carrying any nuclear material also goes against article 17 of UNCLOS. Along these lines, Russia’s Federal legislation which caters for adopting ‘counterrestrictions’ on foreign warships is still contrary to UNCLOS, regardless of the other foreign States actions towards Russian vessels. In light of this limited State practice, it is apparent that UNCLOS was successful in creating an international source of legislation which caters for this doctrine of innocent passage and where resistance is present, it seems to be in relation to allowing unfettered innocent passage to warships and nuclear-powered ships or ships carrying nuclear or other inherently dangerous or noxious substances.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982 December 10)en_GB
dc.subjectLaw of the seaen_GB
dc.subjectInnocent passage (Law of the sea)en_GB
dc.subjectTerritorial watersen_GB
dc.titleCoastal state regulation of innocent passage : a comparative studyen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorCamilleri, Isaac (2022)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22LLB042.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.