Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105624
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbela, Nicola-
dc.contributor.authorCouto, Jose Guilherme-
dc.contributor.authorZarb, Francis-
dc.contributor.authorMizzi, Deborah-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T13:17:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-26T13:17:21Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationAbela, N., Couto, J. G., Zarb, F., & Mizzi, D. (2022). Evaluating the use of anti-scatter grids in adult knee radiography. Radiography, 28(3), 663-667.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105624-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Anti-scatter grids efficiently reduce scatter radiation from reaching the imaging receptor, enhancing image quality; however, the patient radiation dose increases in the process. There is disagreement regarding the thickness thresholds for which anti-scatter grids are beneficial. This study aims to establish a thickness threshold for the use of anti-scatter grids to optimise adult knee radiography.en_GB
dc.description.abstractMethods: The study consisted of two phases. In Phase 1 phantom knee radiographs were acquired at varying thicknesses (10–16 cm) and tube voltages (60–80 kV). For each thickness and tube voltage, images with and without an anti-scatter grid were obtained. In Phase 2, two radiologists and three radiographers, evaluated the image quality of these images. Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) scores were analysed using Visual Grading Characteristics (VGC) based on the visualisation of five anatomic criteria.en_GB
dc.description.abstractResults: The average DAP decreased by 72.1% and mAs by 73.1% when removing the anti-scatter grid. The VGC revealed that overall images taken with an anti-scatter grid have better image quality (AUC ≥0.5 for all comparisons). However, the anti-scatter grids could be removed for thicknesses 10, 12 and 14 cm in conjunction with using 80 kVp,.en_GB
dc.description.abstractConclusion: Anti-scatter grids can be removed when imaging adult knees between 10 and 12 cm using any kVp setting since the radiation dose is reduced without significantly affecting image quality. For thicknesses >12 cm, the use of anti-scatter grids significantly improves image quality; however, the radiation dose to the patient is increased. The exception is at 14 cm used with 80 kVp, where changes in image quality were insignificant. Implications for practice: Optimisation by removing anti-scatter grids in adult knee radiography seems beneficial below 12 cm thickness with any kVp value. Since the average knee thickness ranges between 10 and 13 cm, anti-scatter grid can be removed for most patients. Nevertheless, further studies are recommended to test if this phantom-based threshold applies to human subjects.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectRadiography, Medical -- Digital techniquesen_GB
dc.subjectScattering, Radiation -- Evaluationen_GB
dc.subjectKnee -- Radiography -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectRadiation dosimetry -- Evaluationen_GB
dc.titleEvaluating the use of anti-scatter grids in adult knee radiographyen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radi.2022.05.004-
dc.publication.titleRadiographyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScRad

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluating the use of anti scatter grids in adult knee radiography 2022.pdf
  Restricted Access
663.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.