Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105635
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-27T08:58:10Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-27T08:58:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationCassar, D. (2022). COVID-19 brought the perils of 'short-termism' back to the fore: how will corporate governance respond? (Bachelor's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105635-
dc.descriptionLL.B.(Hons)(Melit.)en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has turned the academic eye onto corporate governance and its current shortcomings. Shareholders are at the centre of the company and its decision-making which is the consequence of the prevalent & well-established shareholder primacy model of corporate governance. This dissertation strives to establish whether the criticism of shareholder primacy, by virtue of its propensity to bring about ‘short-termism’, holds water. The research delves into the perception of shareholders at the apex of the corporation and how such mentality has led to companies pursuing short-term gains over long-term investments. COVID-19, has underlined the message derived from the ’07-’09 financial crisis, that this form of corporate decision making is hampering companies and undercutting their ability to be sustainable. This correlates the corporate purpose and how the company is conceptualized. The research will go one step further and discuss alternative models of corporate governance which have been purveyed by commentators from within the field. It is true a change in corporate governance that one can practice a corporate purpose which values wealth maximisation but in a sustainable manner. The contrast between shareholder and stakeholder primacy is key in illuminating the different models of corporate governance. Other alternatives are also discussed, all of which lend ideas from these two polarised sides of the corporate governance debate. There is no panacea to this issue and this dissertation does not attempt to present any hasty solutions. Companies are nuanced legal creatures and hence, corporate governance must be catered for each specific company. Nevertheless, this research demonstrates the indisputable need for change. It highlights the valuable characteristics which must be embraced in order to achieve the sustainable model of corporate governance required in the contemporary corporate environment.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectInvestment analysis -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectCorporation law -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectCorporate governance -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectCOVID-19 Pandemic, 2020- -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleCOVID-19 brought the perils of 'short-termism' back to the fore : how will corporate governance respond?en_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorCassar, Damian (2022)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22LLB048.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.