Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106061
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMizzi, Deborah-
dc.contributor.authorAllely, Clare-
dc.contributor.authorZarb, Francis-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Judith-
dc.contributor.authorHogg, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorMcEntee, Mark F.-
dc.contributor.authorEngland, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Claire-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T14:09:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-07T14:09:14Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationMizzi, D., Allely, C., Zarb, F., Kelly, J., Hogg, P., McEntee, M.,...Mercer, C. (2022). Examining the effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Radiology, 154, 110416.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn18727727-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106061-
dc.description.abstractTo systematically review studies on the effectiveness of supplementary imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts. Materials and methods: A systematic search of peer-reviewed publications in English (January 2000 to March 2021) was carried out. Eight databases were used to retrieve the studies: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Clinical Answers, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, PubMed, and Web of Science. Two radiographers and an academic independently reviewed the articles to determine if the studies met inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were ob- tained by using proportion and diagnostic metanalysis. Results: From 3764 studies that underwent title and abstract screening, 221 studies underwent full-text screening. Of these 42 were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Results for sensitivity, specificity, pos- itive and negative predictive values, cancer detection rates, recall and biopsy rates in women with dense breasts undergoing supplementary imaging were reported. Studies included in this review were heterogeneous, as was the proportion of women undergoing prevalence and incidence screening rounds. Conclusions: Supplementary screening among women with dense breasts who had recent negative mammograms can consistently identify additional cancers and lead to further recalls and biopsies.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd.en_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBreast -- Magnetic resonance imagingen_GB
dc.subjectContrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingen_GB
dc.subjectBreast -- Cancer -- Imagingen_GB
dc.subjectBreast -- Ultrasonic imagingen_GB
dc.subjectTomosynthesisen_GB
dc.titleExamining the effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts : a systematic review and meta-analysisen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110416-
dc.publication.titleEuropean Journal of Radiologyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScRad



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.