Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106168
Title: The right and obligation to prosecute in terms of the Genocide Convention, the Convention against Torture and the Geneva Convention III : a comparative analysis
Authors: Spiteri, Francesca (2022)
Keywords: Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) Genocide
Genocide -- Law and legislation
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984)
Torture (International law)
Diplomatic Conference for the Establishment of International Conventions for the Protection of Victims of War (1949 : Geneva, Switzerland)
War victims -- Legal status, laws, etc.
Prosecution (International law)
Human rights
Issue Date: 2022
Citation: Spiteri, F. (2022). The right and obligation to prosecute in terms of the Genocide Convention, the Convention against Torture and the Geneva Convention III: a comparative analysis (Bachelor's dissertation).
Abstract: The atrocities humanity witnessed through the Two World Wars led to an uproar from States that pushed the international community to do everything in its power to ensure offences related to wars are investigated and that justice prevails. Thus, multiple Conventions were drafted as a way of providing for the successful prosecution of such crimes. The aim of this study is to analyse the articles dealing with the right, as well as the inherent obligation, to prosecute under three key international Conventions, these being - the Geneva Convention III, the Genocide Convention and the Convention Against Torture. A thorough comparative analysis is conducted with the aim of highlighting the differences embodied by the three Conventions, such as those of criminalizing offences under national law and expressly providing for the extradition of those accused of international core crimes. The importance attributed to the prosecution of three core crimes by each Convention, as well as the obligations of States adhering to said Conventions emerge throughout this study. As a result, elements which hinder prosecution of core crimes are also discussed, including the lack of having universal jurisdiction as an absolute principle and certain other procedural elements hindering the complete process of prosecution, namely the lack of judicial enforcement, which ultimately leads to the conviction of the perpetrators; whilst underscoring the future progress which still must be made. Consequently, this dissertation proposes that unless there is an expansion of the International Criminal Court’s ability, empowering it to carry out prosecutions without relying too heavily on State action, coupled with a further expansion of the concept of universal jurisdiction in order for it to become absolute under International Law, justice for victims of core crimes will never be linear and fair.
Description: LL.B.(Hons)(Melit.)
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106168
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22LLB131.pdf
  Restricted Access
986.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.