Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106273
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T14:36:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-13T14:36:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationZammit, M.C. (2022). Journalism and data privacy: a comparative analysis of CJEU and ECtHR jurisprudence (Bachelor's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/106273-
dc.descriptionLL.B.(Hons)(Melit.)en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe role that journalists play in our society remains as essential as ever. Mirroring this development, the promulgation of data protection legislation, and the emphasis on information privacy, has led to an apparent clash of rights. Alleged infringements by public officials and journalists in this regard have made headlines around the world. This dissertation will analyse the right to Freedom of Expression through its historical development. This will also include a discussion on the different definitions of what constitutes as journalism, including the role of blogs and citizen journalism. Subsequently, the studly will scrutinise the right to privacy, both through its historical development, as well as an analysis of the relevant literature. This study will then conduct a conceptual examination of how data protection emanates and differentiates from the fundamental right to privacy. Another chapter will examine the laws in place which underpin the relationship between journalism and data privacy, both under the European Union legal acquis (including the GDPR), as well as legislation passed by the Council of Europe. An analysis of the notion of balancing between data privacy and journalism by different authors will also be conducted. The Fourth Chapter will then follow the main jurisprudence of the ECtHR, and the CJEU. This includes a section on the criterion discussed in the Von Hannover judgements, followed by an examination of how the GDPR has influenced numerous decisions by the CJEU. The last section will examine in depth the Satakunnan judgements, the prominent judgement which discusses data privacy and journalistic rights in both European Courts. This section compares these judgements with the EU Advocate General’s opinion, the dissenting opinions of the ECtHR, and other relevant jurists. This study will conclude with a discussion on the need for more stringent policy guidelines, and the limitations of such a call in an everchanging technological and legal landscape.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Human Rightsen_GB
dc.subjectCourt of Justice of the European Unionen_GB
dc.subjectJournalism -- Law and legislation -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectJournalism -- Law and legislation -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectData protection -- Law and legislation -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectData protection -- Law and legislation -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectFreedom of expression -- Europeen_GB
dc.subjectFreedom of expression -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.titleJournalism and data privacy : a comparative analysis of CJEU and ECtHR jurisprudenceen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorZammit, Matthew Charles (2022)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22LLB148.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.