Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107912
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDemicoli, Audrey-
dc.contributor.authorYannis, George-
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Odette-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-29T05:55:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-29T05:55:11Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.citationDemicoli, A., Yannis, G. & Lewis, O. (2021). Driver perception-reaction times in level 3 automated vehicles. 18th IRF World Meeting and Exhibition, Dubai.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/107912-
dc.description.abstractIn Level 3 automated vehicles (AVs) the driver may engage in secondary tasks but must re-engage in driving if alerted when roadside circumstances exceed the capacity of the AV technology. The research aim was to establish the Perception-Reaction Time (PRT) of drivers in a Level 3 AV in relation to person-specific characteristics, to scenarios with different in-vehicle distractions and type of alerts. This PRT value was compared to that used in road design in different countries to calculate Stopping Sight Distances (SSD). Such PRT is important because the driver needs a timely alert for safe handover from automated to manual vehicle control. The data was collected through a web-based survey which provided demographic information about the respondent, followed by a driving simulation in a Level 3 AV. Driver PRT was taken from the moment of the alert to the moment that participant reacted by clicking an on-screen box. The results gave an average perception-reaction time of 4.23 seconds and showed that the younger age groups have lower PRTs for all scenarios than their older counterparts both for different alerts and secondary tasks. If the existing design standards for SSD are retained, such distances would not be sufficient to allow the driver to resume the driving task in a timely manner. It also resulted that the multisensory alert advantage over the visual alert is effective only until the cognitive capacity of the participant was not exceeded. Such was exceeded when the secondary distraction was reading and typing of a text message.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIRF Globalen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectAutomated vehiclesen_GB
dc.subjectReaction timeen_GB
dc.subjectAutomated vehicles -- Safety measuresen_GB
dc.subjectAutomobiles -- Testingen_GB
dc.titleDriver perception-reaction times in level 3 automated vehiclesen_GB
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferencename18th IRF World Meeting and Exhibitionen_GB
dc.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceDubai, United Arab Emirates. 07-10/11/2021.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacBenSPI

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Demicoli Yannis Lewis 2021.pdf484.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.