Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110424
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElsubeihi, Emad S.-
dc.contributor.authorAttard, Nikolai J.-
dc.contributor.authorZarb, George A.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T13:01:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-05T13:01:16Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationElsubeihi E., Attard N.J., Zarb G.A. (2003). Implant prosthodontics for edentulous patients: current and future directions. In Zarb G., Eckert S., Mericske-Stern R., Jacobs R (Eds.), Boucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients (pp.523-538). St. Louis: Mosby.en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn0323022960-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110424-
dc.description.abstractOsseointegration has had a dramatic influence on prosthodontic practice. With its emphasis on scientific rigor, osseointegration now provides expanded treatment management strategies for virtually all partially and completely edentulous patients (Plates 30-1 through 30-5). The clinical yield from osseointegration as summed up in Box 30-1 reflects the results of numerous studies on its efficacy and effectiveness. In 1990 we reported the results of the first North American long-term prospective implant study in prosthetically maladaptive edentulous patients (Zarb and Schmitt, 1990). One particularly compelling finding was that successful prosthodontic treatment outcomes exceeded individual implant survival ones, and all of the treated patients demonstrated ongoing long-term comfortable and successful prostheses wear. This study and subsequent ones strongly suggested that the provision of a fixed or quasi-fixed (overdenture) prosthesis was the optimal solution to complete denture problems of a functional nature (prosthetic maladaptation). It was concluded that the major determinant of success in wearing removable prostheses was patient perceived comfort and stability. The latter objective would be readily achieved irrespective of the number of successfully osseointegrated fixtures and underscored the merits of diverse applications of a technique that has arguably revolutionized prosthodontic treatment.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMosbyen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectOsseointegrated dental implantsen_GB
dc.subjectOrthodontics -- Prosthesisen_GB
dc.subjectDental prosthesis, implant-supporteden_GB
dc.subjectDental prosthesis designen_GB
dc.subjectJaw, edentulous, partiallyen_GB
dc.titleImplant prosthodontics for edentulous patients : current and future directionsen_GB
dc.title.alternativeBoucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patientsen_GB
dc.typebookParten_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacDenDS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Implant_prosthodontics_for_edentulous_patients_current_and_future_directions(2003).pdf
  Restricted Access
382.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.