Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112367
Title: Interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary lung cancer and lymph nodes on different four-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions
Authors: Mercieca, Susan
Belderbos, Jose S. A.
De Jaeger, Katrien
Schinagl, Dominic A. X.
van der Voort Van Zijp, Noelle
Pomp, Jacqueline
Theuws, Jacqueline
Khalifa, Jonathan
van de Vaart, Paul
van Herk, Marcel
Keywords: Tomography
Tumors
Lungs -- Cancer
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Citation: Mercieca, S., Belderbos, J. S., De Jaeger, K., Schinagl, D. A., Van Zijp, N. V. D. V., Pomp, J., ... & van Herk, M. (2018). Interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary lung cancer and lymph nodes on different four-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 126(2), 325-332.
Abstract: Purpose: The study compared interobserver variation in the delineation of the primary tumour (GTVp) and lymph nodes (GTVln) between three different 4DCT reconstruction types; Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP), Mid-Ventilation (Mid-V) and Mid-Position (Mid-P).
Material and methods: Seven radiation oncologists delineated the GTVp and GTVln on the MIP, Mid-V and Mid-P 4DCT image reconstructions of 10 lung cancer patients. The volumes, the mean standard deviation (SD) and distribution of SD (SD/area) over the median surface contour were compared for different tumour regions.
Results: The overall mean delineated volume on the MIP was significantly larger (p < 0.001) than the Mid V and Mid-P. For the GTVp the Mid-P had the lowest interobserver variation (SD = 0.261 cm), followed by Mid-V (SD = 0.314 cm) and MIP (SD = 0.330 cm) For GTVln the Mid-V had the lowest interobserver variation (SD = 0.425 cm) followed by the MIP (SD = 0.477 cm) and Mid-P (SD = 0.543 cm). The SD/area distribution showed a statistically significant difference between the MIP versus Mid-P and Mid-P versus Mid-V for both GTVp and GTVln (p < 0.001), with outliers indicating interpretation differences for GTVp located close to the mediastinum and GTVln.
Conclusion: The Mid-P reduced the interobserver variation for the GTVp. Delineation protocols must be improved to benefit from the improved image quality of Mid-P for the GTVln.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/112367
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScRad



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.