Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113259
Title: Harm from vaccines : science, myth or reality
Authors: Chen, Hei Ying (2023)
Keywords: Vaccination -- Public opinion
COVID-19 vaccines -- Safety measures -- Public opinion
Public opinion -- Malta
Issue Date: 2023
Citation: Chen, H.Y. (2023). Harm from vaccines: science, myth or reality (Master's dissertation).
Abstract: Re-emergence of vaccine hesitancy has been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to increased disease burden on public health. Social media plays a vital role in influencing an individual’s intention towards vaccination, where scientific and rumoured information are accessible to all social network users. Characterising science, myths and realities of vaccines-related information can contribute to addressing vaccine hesitancy, consequently facilitating vaccination uptake. The aim of the study was to identify determinants of vaccination intention among the general population. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and validated by an expert panel consisting of two physicians, a hospital pharmacist, a community pharmacist and two laypersons. The questionnaire was disseminated online over a four-week period among individuals who were non-healthcare professionals and aged 18 years or older. Descriptive statistics were performed. A total of 111 respondents (59 female, 73% <45 years old, 63% graduate level of education, 69% Maltese) completed the questionnaire. COVID-19 vaccination rate in this study was 97.3% (n=108). Concern regarding the safety profile of novel COVID-19 vaccines was the reason for not taking the vaccine in 2 of the 3 unvaccinated participants. Among the vaccinated individuals, the main determinants were to protect themselves (n=77, 69%) and the people around them (n=82, 74%). Forty-seven percent (n=51) completed the first booster and 9% (n=10) did not accept the booster dose. The majority (60%, n=65) experienced at least one adverse effect after immunisation, mostly tiredness (n=35), fever (n=33) and muscle aches (n=33). Mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 was agreed by 37% (n=41) of the participants while an equal percentage disagreed. Most respondents (69%, n=77) referred to national media, including TV, radio and newspapers, as the main source of COVID-19 information, followed by social media (48%, n=53). Most respondents ranked effectiveness (42%, n=47) and side-effects (30%, n=33) as ‘extremely important’ indicators when deciding to accept or refuse vaccination against viral infections in general. This study identified effectiveness and information about side-effects as the key determinants of vaccination intention. National and social media were the main sources of COVID-19 information among the participants.
Description: M. ACP(Melit.)
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113259
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacM&S - 2023
Dissertations - FacM&SPha - 2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2327MDSPHR562605071561_1.PDF
  Restricted Access
1.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.