Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113424| Title: | The admissibility of similar fact evidence in criminal trials : an English perspective |
| Authors: | Filletti, Stefano |
| Keywords: | Admissible evidence Criminal procedure -- Great Britain Criminal law -- Great Britain Criminal law -- Cases Criminal justice, Administration of |
| Issue Date: | 2002 |
| Publisher: | Malta Chamber of Advocates |
| Citation: | Filletti, S. (2002). The admissibility of similar fact evidence in criminal trials: an English perspective. Law & Practice, 6, pp. 24-25, 28. |
| Abstract: | The general rule on admissibility is that all relevant evidence is admissible, subject to the exception found in the similar fact rule that the prosecution cannot in general adduce evidence of misconduct by the defendant on occasions other than that relating to the offence charged, or of any disposition or propensity of the defendant to behave in any manner in order to prove the case. |
| URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113424 |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacLawCri |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The admissibility of similar fact evidence in criminal trials an English perspective 2002.pdf | 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.