Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113425
Title: | The exclusionary rule of hearsay … a blessing or a curse? |
Authors: | Filletti, Stefano |
Keywords: | Evidence, Hearsay -- Malta Evidence, Criminal -- Malta Criminal procedure -- Malta Admissible evidence Criminal law -- Malta |
Issue Date: | 2001 |
Publisher: | Malta Chamber of Advocates |
Citation: | Filletti, S. (2001). The exclusionary rule of hearsay … a blessing or a curse?. Law & Practice, 2, pp. 23-24, 26. |
Abstract: | Few would disagree that the rule on hearsay is the most complex and confusing exclusionary rule of evidence. By and large, the exclusionary rule of hearsay dictates that a statement other than that made by a person whilst tendering oral evidence in proceedings is inadmissable as evidence of any fact or opinion stated. This applies equally to all statements made, whether oral, in writing, or by conduct and to hearsay of all degrees. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113425 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacLawCri |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The exclusionary rule of hearsay a blessing or a curse 2001.pdf | 1.93 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.