Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113563
Title: Self- and community perceptions of the learning support educators in Malta and their role in promoting inclusion
Authors: Vella Haber, Pearl Marie
Keywords: Inclusive education -- Malta
Community and school -- Malta
Children with disabilities -- Education -- Malta
Children with disabilities -- Services for -- Malta
Instructional systems -- Malta
Issue Date: 2023-06
Publisher: University of Malta. Faculty of Education
Citation: Vella Haber, P. M. (2023). Self- and community perceptions of the learning support educators in Malta and their role in promoting inclusion. Malta Review of Educational Research, 17(1), 159-174.
Abstract: The goal of the study was to delve into the self- and community perceptions of the Learning Support Educators (LSEs) and their role in promoting inclusion. A qualitative study was carried out, in which ten participants, five males and five females, were selected to share their experience as LSEs. The participants had different levels of experience and training, and had diverse school backgrounds. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used in this research. In-depth semi-structured interviews were utilized to collect data. The analysis yielded twelve themes: the experience of the participants’ first year in their role; the circumstances that led them to choosing the role; the complex duty roles LSEs take on which differ greatly from the job description outlined in policy documents; segregation, powerlessness and gender stereotyping that come with the role; the dynamics of the school community and the role that LSEs have within this community, as well as their relationship with other staff members, namely teachers, SMT and the school INCO; the issue of disconnectedness from, as well as belongingness to the school; the perception of the Maltese community of LSEs; their own relationship to the role; barriers to inclusion, along with the factors that make a school inclusive; and good practice in the field. The last-mentioned theme was developed to recommend the way forward. A number of recommendations were suggested, namely: the implementation of a structured training programme; the opportunity to specialise in specific areas of disability; the granting of a warrant; the opportunity to work in close collaboration with teachers and the possibility of being trained together to improve practice for both parties; and regular training opportunities and reviewing to ensure a high level of professional practice. In the final analysis, this study uncovers the lack of respect and esteem that LSEs encounter, while exposing LSEs as an underutilised resource, whose efforts often go unrecognised.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113563
Appears in Collections:MRER, Volume 17, Issue 1
MRER, Volume 17, Issue 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MRER17(1)A8.pdf245.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.