Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113684
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-10T06:50:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-10T06:50:52Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationDebrincat, T. (2023). Profitability determinants : empirical evidence from the banking sector (Bachelor’s dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113684-
dc.descriptionB.Com.(Hons)(Melit.)en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis research study empirically examines a set of carefully chosen profitability determinants for a sample of 50 banks operating in different countries across the EU, America, Asia, Africa and Australia from 2007 to 2021. Two types of data methods were employed; a multiple linear regression model was used to identify the impact of the variables on each bank separately, and then a panel data regression model (two-level random intercept model) was used to provide a conclusion on the determinants and their relationship with bank’s profitability. The outcomes of the multiple linear regression demonstrate a consistent negative relation between bank size and bank profitability in all three instances of profitability assessments. ROAA and NIM have a positive relationship with capital adequacy. However, there is a negative relationship between capital adequacy and ROAE. Management efficiency has a negative relationship with both ROAA and ROAE. Management efficiency, on the other hand, has a positive relationship with NIM, contrary to predictions. Finally, ROAA and NIM have a positive association with liquidity risk, whilst ROAE has a negative relationship with liquidity risk. The panel data regression results, show that there is no correlation between bank size and ROAE, but there is a negative relationship between bank size and ROAA and/or NIM. Capital adequacy has a positive association with ROAA and NIM but has no influence on ROAE. Furthermore, there are no associations between management efficiency and ROAA, ROAE, and/or NIM. Finally, there is no link between liquidity risk and NIM, but there is a negative link between liquidity risk and ROAA and ROAE.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBanks and bankingen_GB
dc.subjectBanks and banking -- Malta -- Econometric modelsen_GB
dc.subjectBank liquidity -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectRisk management -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleProfitability determinants : empirical evidence from the banking sectoren_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy. Department of Banking and Financeen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorDebrincat, Tania (2023)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacEma - 2023
Dissertations - FacEMABF - 2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2308EMABKF413105069107_1.PDF
  Restricted Access
10.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.