Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113684
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-10T06:50:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-10T06:50:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Debrincat, T. (2023). Profitability determinants : empirical evidence from the banking sector (Bachelor’s dissertation). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/113684 | - |
dc.description | B.Com.(Hons)(Melit.) | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | This research study empirically examines a set of carefully chosen profitability determinants for a sample of 50 banks operating in different countries across the EU, America, Asia, Africa and Australia from 2007 to 2021. Two types of data methods were employed; a multiple linear regression model was used to identify the impact of the variables on each bank separately, and then a panel data regression model (two-level random intercept model) was used to provide a conclusion on the determinants and their relationship with bank’s profitability. The outcomes of the multiple linear regression demonstrate a consistent negative relation between bank size and bank profitability in all three instances of profitability assessments. ROAA and NIM have a positive relationship with capital adequacy. However, there is a negative relationship between capital adequacy and ROAE. Management efficiency has a negative relationship with both ROAA and ROAE. Management efficiency, on the other hand, has a positive relationship with NIM, contrary to predictions. Finally, ROAA and NIM have a positive association with liquidity risk, whilst ROAE has a negative relationship with liquidity risk. The panel data regression results, show that there is no correlation between bank size and ROAE, but there is a negative relationship between bank size and ROAA and/or NIM. Capital adequacy has a positive association with ROAA and NIM but has no influence on ROAE. Furthermore, there are no associations between management efficiency and ROAA, ROAE, and/or NIM. Finally, there is no link between liquidity risk and NIM, but there is a negative link between liquidity risk and ROAA and ROAE. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Banks and banking | en_GB |
dc.subject | Banks and banking -- Malta -- Econometric models | en_GB |
dc.subject | Bank liquidity -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Risk management -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.title | Profitability determinants : empirical evidence from the banking sector | en_GB |
dc.type | bachelorThesis | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Malta | en_GB |
dc.publisher.department | Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy. Department of Banking and Finance | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | N/A | en_GB |
dc.contributor.creator | Debrincat, Tania (2023) | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - FacEma - 2023 Dissertations - FacEMABF - 2023 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2308EMABKF413105069107_1.PDF Restricted Access | 10.44 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.