Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/115315Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Buttigieg, Christopher P. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cuyle, Samantha | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-08T14:46:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-08T14:46:16Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Buttigieg, C. P., & Cuyle, S. (2020). A comparative analysis of EU homegrown crypto-asset regulatory frameworks. European Law Review, (5), 639-659. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.issn | 03075400 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/115315 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The article critically analyses recent policy initiatives at international and national level regarding the regulation of the crypto-asset sector, including the European Commission’s consultation document. It also aims to provide a comparative analysis of two notable crypto-asset frameworks which have been established in the EU, namely the frameworks established by Malta and France, which cover the conduct, prudential and market integrity aspects of the sector. The article identifies the relative strengths and weaknesses of the respective frameworks and extract the positive elements which could be incorporated into a holistic, harmonised crypto-asset framework for EU adoption. | en_GB |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. | en_GB |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Digital currency -- Law and legislation -- Malta | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Digital currency -- Law and legislation -- France | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Money laundering -- Law and legislation -- European Union countries | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Cryptocurrencies -- Law and legislation -- Malta | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Cryptocurrencies -- Law and legislation -- France | en_GB |
| dc.title | A comparative analysis of EU homegrown crypto-asset regulatory frameworks | en_GB |
| dc.type | article | en_GB |
| dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
| dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | en_GB |
| dc.publication.title | European Law Review | en_GB |
| Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacEMABF | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A_comparative_analysis_of_EU_homegrown_crypto-asset_regulatory_frameworks(2020).pdf Restricted Access | 502.36 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.