Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116323
Title: | ESHRE good practice recommendations for add- ons in reproductive medicine |
Authors: | Vlaisavljevic, Veljko Martins, Wellington Gonzalez, Xavier Vinals Farquharson, Roy Sills, E. Scott Garner, Forest Calleja-Agius, Jean Saad, Ahmed Samy Trávník, Pavel Dirican, Enver Kerem Karim, Rukhsana Woodward, Bryan Isikoglu, Mete Raper, Vivienne Calhaz-Jorge, Carlos Gordts, Stephan Holubcová, Zuzana Cahill, David D'Angelo, Arianna Pados, George Newson, Ainsley Gallagher, Siun Lipworth, Wendy Elnashar, Aboubakr Mohamed Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Liliana, Ramos Wang, Chi Chiu Smitz, J. Kostova, Elena Ferrer-Buitrago, Minerva Magli, Cristina El-Toukhy, Tarek Galal, Ahmed Fawzy Thornhill, Alan Venetis, Christos Kolibianakis, Efstratios Lensen, Sarah Vail, Andy Wilkinson, Jack Petropoulos, Sophie Hamper, Josie Jose De los Santos, Maria |
Keywords: | Reproductive technology -- European Union countries Fertility -- European Union countries Systematic reviews (Medical research) Human reproductive technology |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Publisher: | European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology |
Citation: | Vlaisavljevic, V., Martins, V., Gonzalez, X. V., Farquharson, R., Sills, E. S., Garner, F., Calleja-Agius, J., ..., Jose De los Santos, M. (2022). ESHRE Good practice recommendations for add- ons in reproductive medicine. ESHRE Add-ons Working Group. |
Abstract: | The draft of the paper “ESHRE Good practice recommendations for add-ons in reproductive medicine” was published for public review for 4 weeks, between 1 November and 1 December 2022. This report summarizes all reviewers, their comments and the reply of the working group and is published on the ESHRE website as supporting documentation to the paper. During the stakeholder review, a total of 274 comments (including 24 duplicates) were received from 46 reviewers. Reviewers included professionals and representatives of donor-conceived offspring organisations. The comments were focussed on the content of the guideline (209 comments), language and style (31 comments), or were remarks that did not require a reply (10 comments). All comments to the language and format were checked and corrected where relevant. The comments to the content of the paper (n=209) were assessed by the working group and where relevant, adaptations were made in the paper (n=94; 45%). Adaptations included revisions and/or clarifications of the text, and amendments to the recommendations. For a number of comments, the working group considered them outside the scope of the paper or not appropriate/relevant (n=115; 55%). |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116323 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ESHRE_good_practice_recommendations_for_add-_ons_in_reproductive_medicine(2022).pdf | 663.75 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.