Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116323
Title: ESHRE good practice recommendations for add- ons in reproductive medicine
Authors: Vlaisavljevic, Veljko
Martins, Wellington
Gonzalez, Xavier Vinals
Farquharson, Roy
Sills, E. Scott
Garner, Forest
Calleja-Agius, Jean
Saad, Ahmed Samy
Trávník, Pavel
Dirican, Enver Kerem
Karim, Rukhsana
Woodward, Bryan
Isikoglu, Mete
Raper, Vivienne
Calhaz-Jorge, Carlos
Gordts, Stephan
Holubcová, Zuzana
Cahill, David
D'Angelo, Arianna
Pados, George
Newson, Ainsley
Gallagher, Siun
Lipworth, Wendy
Elnashar, Aboubakr Mohamed
Cimadomo, Danilo
Capalbo, Antonio
Liliana, Ramos
Wang, Chi Chiu
Smitz, J.
Kostova, Elena
Ferrer-Buitrago, Minerva
Magli, Cristina
El-Toukhy, Tarek
Galal, Ahmed Fawzy
Thornhill, Alan
Venetis, Christos
Kolibianakis, Efstratios
Lensen, Sarah
Vail, Andy
Wilkinson, Jack
Petropoulos, Sophie
Hamper, Josie
Jose De los Santos, Maria
Keywords: Reproductive technology -- European Union countries
Fertility -- European Union countries
Systematic reviews (Medical research)
Human reproductive technology
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Citation: Vlaisavljevic, V., Martins, V., Gonzalez, X. V., Farquharson, R., Sills, E. S., Garner, F., Calleja-Agius, J., ..., Jose De los Santos, M. (2022). ESHRE Good practice recommendations for add- ons in reproductive medicine. ESHRE Add-ons Working Group.
Abstract: The draft of the paper “ESHRE Good practice recommendations for add-ons in reproductive medicine” was published for public review for 4 weeks, between 1 November and 1 December 2022. This report summarizes all reviewers, their comments and the reply of the working group and is published on the ESHRE website as supporting documentation to the paper. During the stakeholder review, a total of 274 comments (including 24 duplicates) were received from 46 reviewers. Reviewers included professionals and representatives of donor-conceived offspring organisations. The comments were focussed on the content of the guideline (209 comments), language and style (31 comments), or were remarks that did not require a reply (10 comments). All comments to the language and format were checked and corrected where relevant. The comments to the content of the paper (n=209) were assessed by the working group and where relevant, adaptations were made in the paper (n=94; 45%). Adaptations included revisions and/or clarifications of the text, and amendments to the recommendations. For a number of comments, the working group considered them outside the scope of the paper or not appropriate/relevant (n=115; 55%).
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/116323
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ESHRE_good_practice_recommendations_for_add-_ons_in_reproductive_medicine(2022).pdf663.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.