Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/117060
Title: Evaluation of HbA1c using high performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients suspected to have haemoglobin variant
Authors: Wan Nik, Wan Nor Fazila Hafizan
Shafii, Noorazliyana
Ismail, Tuan Salwani Tuan
Yaacob, Najib Majdi
Keywords: Chromatography, High pressure liquid
Electrophoresis, capillary
Type 2 diabetes
Hemoglobin polymorphisms
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: University of Malta. Medical School
Citation: Wan Nik, W. N. F. H., Shafii, N., Ismail, T. S. T., & Yaacob, N. M. (2023). Evaluation of HbA1c using high performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients suspected to have haemoglobin variant. Malta Medical Journal, 35(2), 51-56.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is widely used for HbA1c measurement. However, it is prone to haemoglobin (Hb) variant interference. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is believed to have better performance in patients with Hb variant. This study aimed to compare HbA1c level between HPLC and CE among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients suspected to have Hb variant, determine the type of Hb variant among those patients, and evaluate the agreement between both methods.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted at Endocrine Laboratory, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, from June till December 2020. HbA1c results of adults T2DM from HPLC with suspected Hb variant were re-analysed using CE. The comparisons of HbA1c were made using paired t-test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. The correlation and method comparison were made using Pearson correlation, Bland Altman (BA) and Passing-Bablok (PB), whereas the agreement using Intraclass Coefficients Correlation (ICC).
RESULTS: 250 patients were included with a median (IQR) age of 52.19 (11.11) years. For reportable results (?3.8% to ?18.5%), both methods showed no difference (p=0.382) whereas the results were difference for HbA1c >18.5% (p=0.048). 26 patients had Hb analysis with majority having Hb E trait 14 (5.6%). HPLC overestimated HbA1c in patients with Hb J and alpha Hb variant while CE able to report. Pearson correlation and PB regression analysis showed good correlation (r=0.987, p<0.001) and good agreement [slope of 1.0 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.03); intercept of -0.3 (95% CI: ?0.61 to 0.30)]. BA plot revealed a mean difference of 0.30% (95% CI:0.00 to 0.50) with limits of agreement from ?0.54 to +1.14. ICC showed excellent reliability (0.983 (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: HPLC and CE can be used interchangeably for HbA1c analysis across the measurement range. CE is the preferred in T2DM with certain Hb variant.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/117060
Appears in Collections:MMJ, Volume 35, Issue 2
MMJ, Volume 35, Issue 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MMJ35(2)A8.pdf587.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.