Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119837
Title: How the other compares : difference and the practice of comparative literature
Authors: Callus, Ivan
Keywords: Comparative literature
Literature -- Study and teaching -- Political aspects
Postcolonialism in literature
Other (Philosophy)
Literature -- History and criticism
Issue Date: 1999
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Citation: Callus, I. (1999). How the other compares: Difference and the practice of comparative literature. Arcadia, 34(2), 366-373.
Abstract: Callus covers the political implications arising from the view that comparative literature can be said to have an obligation to raise the issue of its own conditions of existence. Comparative literature, in this view, finds itself confronting a double bind from which it cannot emancipate itself without abdicating responsibilities which it is, perhaps uniquely, called upon to bear. That double bind is one which, holding comparative literature to the task of being "an intellectual procedure aimed at the study of any object with a claim to being literary by putting it in relation to other inherent elements of a culture,"1 thereupon confers upon the discipline the obligation to undertake a primary comparative process, and analyze the different conditions in which it is differentially given being.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119837
ISSN: 16130642
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacArtEng

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
How_the_other_compares__difference_and_the_practice_of_comparative_literature(1999).pdf
  Restricted Access
1.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.