Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120388
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuckvale, Kit-
dc.contributor.authorPrieto, José Tomás-
dc.contributor.authorTilney, Myra Kay-
dc.contributor.authorBenghozi, Pierre-Jean-
dc.contributor.authorCar, Josip-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-28T14:56:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-28T14:56:25Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationHuckvale, K., Prieto, J. T., Tilney, M., Benghozi, P. J., & Car, J. (2015). Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC medicine, 13, 1-13.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120388-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Poor information privacy practices have been identified in health apps. Medical app accreditation programs offer a mechanism for assuring the quality of apps; however, little is known about their ability to control information privacy risks. We aimed to assess the extent to which already-certified apps complied with data protection principles mandated by the largest national accreditation program. Methods: Cross-sectional, systematic, 6-month assessment of 79 apps certified as clinically safe and trustworthy by the UK NHS Health Apps Library. Protocol-based testing was used to characterize personal information collection, local-device storage and information transmission. Observed information handling practices were compared against privacy policy commitments. Results: The study revealed that 89 % (n = 70/79) of apps transmitted information to online services. No app encrypted personal information stored locally. Furthermore, 66 % (23/35) of apps sending identifying information over the Internet did not use encryption and 20 % (7/35) did not have a privacy policy. Overall, 67 % (53/79) of apps had some form of privacy policy. No app collected or transmitted information that a policy explicitly stated it would not; however, 78 % (38/49) of information-transmitting apps with a policy did not describe the nature of personal information included in transmissions. Four apps sent both identifying and health information without encryption. Although the study was not designed to examine data handling after transmission to online services, security problems appeared to place users at risk of data theft in two cases. Conclusions: Systematic gaps in compliance with data protection principles in accredited health apps question whether certification programs relying substantially on developer disclosures can provide a trusted resource for patients and clinicians. Accreditation programs should, as a minimum, provide consistent and reliable warnings about possible threats and, ideally, require publishers to rectify vulnerabilities before apps are released.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectSmartphones -- Health aspectsen_GB
dc.subjectMobile appsen_GB
dc.subjectHospitals -- Accreditationen_GB
dc.subjectNational health services -- Great Britainen_GB
dc.subjectPrivacyen_GB
dc.subjectConfidential communicationsen_GB
dc.subjectSystematic reviews (Medical research)en_GB
dc.titleUnaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps : a cross-sectional systematic assessmenten_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holderen_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y-
dc.publication.titleBMC medicineen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SMed

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Unaddressed_privacy_risks_in_accredited_health_and_wellness.pdf514.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.