Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120417
Title: Implementation and short-term adverse events of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in inflammatory bowel disease patients : an international web-based survey
Authors: Ellul, Pierre
Revés, Joana
Abreu, Bárbara
Chaparro, María
Gisbert, Javier P.
Allocca, Mariangela
Fiorino, Gionata
Barberio, Brigida
Zingone, Fabiana
Pisani, Anthea
Cassar, David
Michalopoulos, George
Mantzaris, Gerassimos
Koutroubakis, Ioannis
Karmiris, Konstantinos
Katsanos, Konstantinos
Ďuricova, Dana
Burisch, Johan
Madsen, Gorm Roager
Maaser, Christian
Naila, Arebi
Orfanoudaki, Eleni
Milivojevic, Vladimir
Buisson, Anthony
Avedano, Luisa
Leone, Salvo
Torres, Joana
Keywords: Inflammatory bowel diseases
Crohn's disease
Ulcerative colitis
COVID-19 (Disease)
COVID-19 vaccines
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Citation: Ellul, P., Revés, J., Abreu, B., Chaparro, M., Gisbert, J. P., Allocca, M., ... & Torres, J. (2022). Implementation and short-term adverse events of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in inflammatory bowel disease patients: an international web-based survey. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, 16(7), 1070-1078.
Abstract: Introduction: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine clinical trials did not include patients with immune-mediated conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. We aimed to describe the implementation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among IBD patients, patients’ concerns, and the side effect profile of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, using real-world data. Methods: An anonymous web-based self-completed survey was distributed in 36 European countries between June and July 2021. The results of the patient characteristics, concerns, vaccination status, and side effect profile were analysed. Results: In all 3272 IBD patients completed the survey, 79.6% had received at least one dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and 71.7% had completed the vaccination process. Patients over 60 years old had a significantly higher rate of vaccination [p < 0.001]. Patients’ main concerns before vaccination were the possibility of having worse vaccine-related adverse events due to their IBD [24.6%], an IBD flare after vaccination [21.1%], and reduced vaccine efficacy due to IBD or associated immunosuppression [17.6%]. After the first dose of the vaccine, 72.4% had local symptoms and 51.4% had systemic symptoms [five patients had non-specified thrombosis]. Adverse events were less frequent after the second dose of the vaccine and in older patients. Only a minority of the patients were hospitalised [0.3%], needed a consultation [3.6%], or had to change IBD therapy [13.4%] after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Conclusions: Although IBD patients raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the implementation of vaccination in those responding to our survey was high and the adverse events were comparable to the general population, with minimal impact on their IBD.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/120417
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SMed



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.