Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/124401
Title: | Protecting the right to secrecy of correspondence : constitutional myths and reality in modern Greece |
Authors: | Giannoulopoulos, Dimitrios |
Keywords: | Secrecy -- Law and legislation -- Greece Electronic surveillance -- Law and legislation -- Greece Confidential communications -- Greece Privacy, Right of -- Greece Freedom of the press -- Greece Wiretapping -- Law and legislation -- Greece |
Issue Date: | 2005 |
Publisher: | University of Malta. Faculty of Laws |
Citation: | Giannoulopoulos, D. (2005). Protecting the right to secrecy of correspondence: constitutional myths and reality in modern Greece. Mediterranean Journal of Human Rights, 9(2), 119-148. |
Abstract: | The broadcast of unlawfully intercepted communications in investigative journalism TV programmes has become trivial in recent years in Greece. However, the use of recordings obtained through improper telephone interceptions and surveillance constitutes a criminal offence. It is punished under provisions of the Penal Code and other statutory legislation that reflect the constitutional right to secrecy of correspondence. Interference with this right is possible, but only if it is judicially authorised interference within the limits set by the Constitution and statutory law. Law 2225/ 1994 specifies these constitutional limits and goes as far as to forbid the use of any legally intercepted material for any other reasons than those for which the interceptions were authorised. More important, unlawfully intercepted communications cannot be used as evidence in a criminal court, especially after article 19 para. 3 of the Constitution instituted an automatic exclusionary rule for violations of privacy. Thus, one can identify in Greece a complete framework of innovative privacy and 'right to correspondence' protections, of constitutional and criminal law nature. Independent administrative authorities play an important role in the protection of privacy as well. Therefore, the continuing arbitrary broadcast on TV of intercepted communications is a demonstration of significant inconsistency between human rights rhetoric and practice. It reveals generalised public indifference towards blatant privacy violations and highlights the responsibility of the Prosecution Authority in regard to the enforcement of constitutional rights. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/124401 |
Appears in Collections: | Mediterranean Journal of Human Rights, volume 9 number 2 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Protecting_the_right_to_secrecy_of_correspondence_constitutional_myths_and_reality_in_modern_Greece(2005).pdf | 41.13 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.