Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/125336
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSammut, Lara-
dc.contributor.authorBezzina, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Viven-
dc.contributor.authorCalleja-Agius, Jean-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T06:28:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-12T06:28:12Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationSammut, L., Bezzina, P., Gibbs, V., & Calleja-Agius, J. (2024). Assessing the predictive value of first trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers in miscarriage : a scoping review. Radiography, 30(5), 1368-1375.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/125336-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Vaginal bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy generates anxiety and uncertainty for expecting parents. The ability to determine pregnancy outcome through a first trimester ultrasound scan remains a challenge in obstetrics. Several first trimester ultrasound markers used individually or in combination, as well as ultrasound markers used in combination with biochemical markers, have been studied to determine their predictive value in pregnancy outcome. This scoping review was performed to determine which markers have already been investigated for this purpose.en_GB
dc.description.abstractMethods: An extensive and systematic database search was performed using four different categories of keywords which were combined using Boolean terms. A total of 14 variables were included on the final data charting forms. Data was synthesised collectively for each variable and then separately for the studies analysing only one marker. For the studies which analysed multiple markers, data was synthesised based on the number of markers per study.en_GB
dc.description.abstractResults: The search yielded 3608 studies, of which 128 were ultimately used for this review. Data extraction, based on predetermined eligibility criteria, was performed by two authors independently. Seventy-seven (62.6%) studies investigated the predictive value of a single ultrasound marker. The remaining 46 (37.4%) studies explored multiple markers, of which at least one was an ultrasound marker.en_GB
dc.description.abstractConclusion: This review identified several discrepancies among different studies. This highlights the need for better consensus among researchers to allow for the design of a predictive model which enables extrapolation of findings to all pregnant women.en_GB
dc.description.abstractImplications for practice: Through the study of ultrasound and biochemical markers in the first trimester of pregnancy, clinicians may provide a more accurate prediction of pregnancy outcome following threatened miscarriage.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectMiscarriageen_GB
dc.subjectBiochemical geneticsen_GB
dc.subjectPregnancy -- Trimester, Firsten_GB
dc.subjectObstetricsen_GB
dc.titleAssessing the predictive value of first trimester ultrasound and biochemical markers in miscarriage : a scoping reviewen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.022-
dc.publication.titleRadiographyen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.