General principles referred to in judgments in which Malta was the respondent State

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/128761

Title:	General principles referred to in judgments in which Malta was the respondent State
Other Titles:	Malta at the European Court of Human Rights, 1987-2012
Authors:	Comodini Cachia, Therese
Keywords:	Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950 November 5) European Court of Human Rights Right of property -- European Union countries Possession (Law) -- European Union countries
Issue Date:	2012
Publisher:	Kotba-Argo
Citation:	Comodini Cachia, T. (2012). General principles referred to in judgments in which Malta was the respondent State. In M. A. Sammut, P. Cuignet, & D. A. Borg (Eds.), Malta at the European Court of Human Rights 1987-2012 (pp. 250-286). Malta: Kotba-Argo.
Abstract:	The author presents an analysis of the general principles referred to in the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in cases instituted against Malta by applicants seeking the protection of their right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions as guaranteed by Article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention. The analysis also provides case studies and a critical analysis of the application of the principles defining this right.
URI:	https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/128761
Appears in Collections:	Scholarly Works - FacLawPub

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
Malta at the European Court of Human Rights, Chapter 5, Article 1 Protocol 1.pdf Restricted Access		10.05 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open Request a copy