Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/134441
Title: The role of the 2011 patients’ rights in cross-border health care directive in shaping seven national health systems : looking beyond patient mobility
Authors: Azzopardi Muscat, Natasha
Baeten, Rita
Clemens, Timo
Habicht, Triin
Keskimäki, Ilmo
Kowalska-Bobko, Iwona
Sagan, Anna
van Ginneken, Ewout
Keywords: Medical policy -- European Union countries
Health services accessibility -- European Union countries
European Parliament. Directive 2011/24/EU
Medical care -- Law and legislation -- European Union countries
Patients -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- European Union countries
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Azzopardi Muscat, N., Baeten, R., Clemens, T., Habicht, T., Keskimäki, I., Kowalska-Bobko, I.,...van Ginneken, E. (2018). The role of the 2011 patients' rights in cross-border health care directive in shaping seven national health systems: Looking beyond patient mobility. Health Policy, 122(3), 279-283.
Abstract: Reports on the implementation of the Directive on the application of Patients’ Rights in Cross-border Healthcare indicate that it had little impact on the numbers of patients seeking care abroad. We set out to explore the effects of this directive on health systems in seven EU Member States. Key informants in Belgium, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Malta, Poland and The Netherlands filled out a structured questionnaire. Findings indicate that the impact of the directive varied between countries and was smaller in countries where a large degree of adaptation had already taken place in response to the European Court of Justice Rulings. The main reforms reported include a heightened emphasis on patient rights and the adoption of explicit benefits packages and tariffs. Countries may be facing increased pressure to treat patients within a medically justifiable time limit. The implementation of professional liability insurance, in countries where this did not previously exist, may also bring benefits for patients. Lowering of reimbursement tariffs to dissuade patients from seeking treatment abroad has been reported in Poland. The issue of discrimination against non-contracted domestic private providers in Estonia, Finland, Malta and The Netherlands remains largely unresolved. We conclude that evidence showing that patients using domestic health systems have actually benefitted from the directive remains scarce and further monitoring over a longer period of time is recommended.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/134441
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScHSM



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.