Coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly : is it worthwhile?

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the early outcomes after coronary surgery in the elderly. Methods: A retrospective analysis (April 1995- January 2012) of mortality, morbidity and hospital stay, derived from a single surgeon’s practice. Outcomes of patients over 70 (group A, n=785) were compared with those of controls under 70 (group B, n=2772). Results: Intervention rate was significantly higher (1502/106 vs 467/106, p<0.0001). There were significantly fewer single and quintuple grafts, and significantly more double grafts in group A. The use of an internal thoracic artery (ITA) was lower in group A (748/785, 95.3% vs 2695/2772, 97.2%, p=0.006). Mortality for the entire coronary surgical practice was 1.2%. The overall mortality was 2.7% in group A and 0.8% in group B (p<0.0001). Freedom from any post- operative complication occurred in 57.7% in group A and in 75.6% in group B (p<0.0001). Cardiac complications (except for perioperative MI and atrial flutter) were significantly higher in group A, as were major neurological, renal and respiratory complications, as well as minor wound complications. All complications resulted in patient morbidity but cerebrovascular accident had the worst impact, contributing to perioperative death in 8 of the 18 cases ingroupAandin4ofthe24casesingroupB (p=0.049). Average length of stay on intensive care was similar (1.19±1.84 days for group A and 1.13±1.48 days for group B, p=0.38). The average HDU stay was longer in group A (1.43±2.70 vs 0.95±3.68 days, p=0.006) as was the average ward stay (4.00±3.33 vs 3.25±2.23 days, p<0.0001). Conclusions: Although mortality and morbidity remain significantly higher, taken in the context of the overall clinical problem, cardiac surgery has much to offer in this select group of patients.