Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/14747
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-16T11:12:49Z
dc.date.available2016-12-16T11:12:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/14747
dc.descriptionB.SC.IT(HONS)en_GB
dc.description.abstractContrary to popular perception, footprints and footwear impressions are more commonly found at crime scenes than fingerprints and DNA. Systems for the analysis and authentication of the latter, have been thoroughly researched throughout the years and are almost perfected. However, the same progress has not been made for footprints. Possible explanations are that footprints are underestimated as evidence, because no shoe sole is unique even though each wears distinctively. Due to the lack of research in this area, a forensic analyst must compare the images manually which is time consuming. This dissertation aims to provide an automatic footprint extraction and correlation system. The system proposed is able to apply pre-processing, extract key features and retrieve the relevant matches from a footwear impression repository. The repository used for this study contains both prints from real crime scenes and prints from newly manufactured shoes known as reference prints. In order to compare images, a distance function was utilised. This function creates a MPEG movie out of the images and employs the size of the movie in order to calculate the similarity. For pre-processing of the prints, apart from common techniques, an original concept of tessellations was applied. The main process of the system takes a crime scene print and compares it to all the reference prints in the repository. Once the distances are calculated by the distance function, an ordered list of prints is generated in ascending order, from most similar to least. The results obtained from the development of this project have shown that the accuracy achieved depends on the quality of the images that are being used. Comparisons are done in two batches: first all crime scene prints are compared with all the reference prints, then the procedure is repeated with pre-processing being applied to the prints.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCriminal investigationen_GB
dc.subjectEvidence, Criminalen_GB
dc.subjectImage Processing, Computer-Assisted -- methodsen_GB
dc.subjectInvestigations -- Data processingen_GB
dc.titleContent-based image retrieval (CBIR) system in digital forensicsen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Information & Communication Technology. Department of Computer Information Systemsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorFarrugia, Neil
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacICT - 2016
Dissertations - FacICTCIS - 2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
16BITSD016.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.