Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/17751
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-22T09:44:00Z
dc.date.available2017-03-22T09:44:00Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/17751
dc.descriptionLL.B.en_GB
dc.description.abstractPerceiving the problems triggered by a lack of consistent framework for the legal protection of trade secrets across the European Union and the need to nurture innovation and creativity within the internal market, in November 2013 the European Commission undertook to propose a Directive which harmonises the minimum safeguards provided by the 28 Member States. The first chapter of this research project gives an overview of the current fragmented scenario, highlighting the existing divergences between Member States’ laws to protect businesses from the misappropriation of their undisclosed know-how. The options explored by the Commission to combat the unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure of trade secrets across the EU are outlined, whilst analysing the reasons why a Directive was deemed to be the preferred option. The second chapter delves into the main features of the initial proposal as drafted by the Commission, namely the common definition and redress mechanisms available to trade secret holders introduced by the Directive. This chapter also sheds light on the criticism which the initiative received from civil society, claiming that a legislation intended to foster innovation and regulate fair competition between businesses will result in a blanket right to corporate secrecy, suppressing citizens’ freedoms and their right to make informed decisions. The third chapter comparatively analyses the amendments made to the Commission’s draft in the final compromise text negotiated between Council and Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs. The final sections of the research project critically examine whether the Commission’s objectives have been reached and whether the approved Directive strikes a balance between corporate and democratic interests.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectTrade secrets -- Law and legislation -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectIntellectual property -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectFreedom of expression -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.titleThe EU Directive on the Protection of Trade Secretsen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Laws. Department of Commercial Lawen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorMifsud, Michela
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2016
Dissertations - FacLawCom - 2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
16LLB096.pdf
  Restricted Access
948.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.