Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/19465
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Baldacchino, Godfrey | |
dc.contributor.author | Helgadottir, Gudrun | |
dc.contributor.author | Mykletun, Reidar Johan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-29T08:51:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-29T08:51:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Baldacchino, G., Helgadóttir, G, & Mykletun. R. J. (2015). Rural tourism : insights from the North Atlantic [Editorial]. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 15(1-2), 1-7. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/19465 | |
dc.description.abstract | One main and accelerating demographic movement the world over is from low-density rural communities to high-density urban and suburban concentrations, from outlying archipelagos to central island towns and cities, from smaller islands to larger islands, and from islands to mainlands. Policy-makers laud the benefits of clusters and mega-cities and question the wisdom and sustainability of scattered communities (Courchene, 2005; Porter, 1990). Peripheral locations – particularly remote rural and island communities – are among the hardest hit by these contemporary mobilities, risking outright depopulation. Their communities lobby frantically for some sustained attention by distant policy-makers, and for investment in employment, educational services, health care, or transportation infrastructure to stem the tide of outward migration. Meanwhile, residents tend to vote with their feet: to the “unemployed, underpaid, or under-appreciated”, going away just makes “a lot of sense” (The Economist, 2005). Meanwhile, and in stark contrast to this scenario, other similarly peripheral locations find themselves attractive to visitors, secondary residents, and mainland retirees, resulting in large spikes in their seasonal (typically summer) populations, strained infrastructure, property price increases, and increasingly gentrified communities (Boissevain & Selwyn, 2004; Clark, Johnson, Lundholm, & Malmberg, 2007; Mu¨ller, 2007). This sounds like a catch-22 case of “damned if you do, and damned if you don’t”. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Rural tourism | en_GB |
dc.subject | North Atlantic Region | en_GB |
dc.subject | Rural development | en_GB |
dc.subject | Editorials | en_GB |
dc.title | Rural tourism : insights from the North Atlantic | en_GB |
dc.type | editorial | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/15022250.2015.1020124 | |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacArtSoc |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rural Tourism Insights from the North Atlantic.pdf | 55.77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.