Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/19873
Title: | Sepsis : where are we up to? |
Authors: | Fenech, Manuel |
Keywords: | Septicemia Blood -- Diseases -- Diagnosis Septicemia -- Treatment |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Publisher: | University of Malta. Medical School |
Citation: | Fenech, M. (2017). Sepsis - where are we up to? [Editorial]. Malta Medical School Gazette, 1(1), 1-2 |
Abstract: | It is quite common that we read about novel infections. We are all aware about the mortality secondary to ST elevation Myocardial Infarction which stands at around 8%. Meanwhile, sepsis is an old enemy that still kills many of our patients across the board. Mortality has remained high despite advances in pathobiology due to its complexity and heterogeneity with up to 10% for sepsis going up to 40% for septic shock. Considerable changes in the 2001 definitions of Sepsis were published in the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). The old definitions including SIRS (Systemic inflammatory response syndrome), Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock were found to be lacking in sensitivity and specificity while being too lax to allow consistency in gathering data. By using electronic health record data from patients admitted with infection it was possible to retrospectively evaluate the best tools to screen for sepsis in patients with suspected infection while aiming for simplicity. |
URI: | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/19873 |
Appears in Collections: | MMSG, Volume 1, Issue 1 MMSG, Volume 1, Issue 1 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Editorial Sepsis – where are we up to.pdf | 865.61 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.