Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2080
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-30T10:05:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-03-30T10:05:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/2080 | |
dc.description | LL.D. | |
dc.description.abstract | We are all witnesses of the ground breaking scientific research and major biotechnological innovations that have developed and come to fruition over the past century. The gene is the very core of human life and is one scientific field of study where development has been outstanding. It was never going to be possible for science to keep developing without updating the requisite legal framework. This thesis therefore begins by exploring the relationship between the patent system and genes, discussing the way in which human gene patents have challenged the traditional boundaries of the patent system. With rapid evolvement comes obvious controversy; gene patenting is now one of the most controversial and hotly debated fields of intellectual property law. The US is a pioneer in biotechnology and a leading country in the field of patent law; it therefore comes as no surprise that the main focus of this study is an analysis of the recent developments in gene patent legislation and litigation in the US. The recent landmark judgment Myriad Genetics has raised the bar on gene patenting by challenging the doctrines and requirements that are crucial to this area of study, such as the product of nature doctrine and the isolation principle. Albeit different in various aspects, the European experience of gene patenting also faces challenges of its own that have led to the imposition of limitations on the scope of gene patents via the Monsanto judgment. The European dimension will also be given due regard in this study. The discussion takes on a gripping dimension, as the analysis must be carried out against a backdrop of a multitude of subjective ethical arguments. The human dignity argument, common heritage of mankind argument are analysed with the ultimate aim of shedding light onto the most frequently asked question: should human genes be patented at all? At the heart of this study is the constant struggle between balancing on the one hand a patent system that encourages innovation by offering the possibility of having one’s creation protected, while on the other hand making sure to avoid monopolies and protecting the interests of humanity as a whole. These arguments together with the ethical debates and the active role the courts have been playing in this field will show how the controversial nature of gene patents will surely live on. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Patent laws and legislation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Human genetics -- Law and legislation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Intellectual property | en_GB |
dc.subject | Patent practice -- United States | en_GB |
dc.title | A legal analysis of the recent developments in human gene patenting | en_GB |
dc.type | masterThesis | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Malta | en_GB |
dc.publisher.department | Faculty of Laws. Department of Commercial Law | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | N/A | en_GB |
dc.contributor.creator | Cassar, Analise | |
Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - FacLaw - 2014 Dissertations - FacLawCom - 2014 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
14LLD035.pdf Restricted Access | 2.26 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.