Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/22742
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-17T08:24:49Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-17T08:24:49Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/22742-
dc.descriptionB.COMMS.(HONS)en_GB
dc.description.abstractAdvertisers strive to break through the clutter and impact an audience. One way this could be done is by intentionally startling, distressing or offending an audience through “shock advertising” (White, 2007, as cited in Javed & Zeb, 2011). This study explores the reactions and attitudes towards shock advertising in general and in the HIV/AIDS context amongst students of the University of Malta aged 20 to 25. Three focus groups were conducted; one focus group consisted of both male and female participants, one of males only and one of females only. The participants were asked to share their thoughts and opinions on shock advertising prior to the introduction of the HIV/AIDS context. They were then exposed to two shocking video adverts consisting of an HIV/AIDS context and their reactions to the videos and the perceived effect on behaviour were elicited. It was found that prior to exposure to the shocking adverts, the participants held an overall positive perception of shock advertising. The beneficial impact it has on memory and recall was evident through the number of shocking adverts that were recalled easily. After exposure to the shocking adverts, it was found that although shocking adverts grab attention, arouse curiosity and increase memory, they could also have negative results. Negative responses included feelings of discomfort, offence and anxiety which could lead to the rejection of the advert and company. Participants thought that it would be more acceptable to adopt this advertising strategy in a careful and responsible manner without offending a segment of the market and believed it to be more ethically justified when used in the public health context rather than commercially. Had the adverts been more relatable and aroused sympathy, they may have been more effective in positively impacting behaviour, however participants were of the opinion that a shocking advert alone is not powerful enough to change HIV/AIDS related behaviour. Overall the male participants reacted more favourably to shock advertising when compared to the female participants as they considered it an acceptable and beneficial form of advertising.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectUniversity students -- Malta -- Attitudesen_GB
dc.subjectAdvertising -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectAIDS (Disease) -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleReactions to shock advertising : a qualitative study amongst University of Malta studentsen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Media & Knowledge Sciencesen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorBriffa, Stephanie-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacMKS - 2014

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
14BCOMM009.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.