Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24068
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhrendt, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorChimento, Jesús Mauricio-
dc.contributor.authorPace, Gordon J.-
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Gerardo-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-22T08:45:29Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-22T08:45:29Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAhrendt, W., Chimento, J. M., Pace, G. J., & Schneider, G. (2017). Verifying data-and control-oriented properties combining static and runtime verification: theory and tools. Formal Methods in System Design, 1-66.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/24068-
dc.description.abstractStatic verification techniques are used to analyse and prove properties about programs before they are executed. Many of these techniques work directly on the source code and are used to verify data-oriented properties over all possible executions. The analysis is necessarily an over-approximation as the real executions of the program are not available at analysis time. In contrast, runtime verification techniques have been extensively used for control-oriented properties, analysing the current execution path of the program in a fully automatic manner. In this article, we present a novel approach in which data-oriented and control-oriented properties may be stated in a single formalism amenable to both static and dynamic verification techniques. The specification language we present to achieve this that of ppDATEs, which enhances the control-oriented property language of DATEs, with data- oriented pre/postconditions. For runtime verification of ppDATE specifications, the language is translated into a DATE. We give a formal semantics to ppDATEs, which we use to prove the correctness of our translation from ppDATEs to DATEs. We show how ppDATE specifi- cations can be analysed using a combination of the deductive theorem prover KeY and the runtime verification tool LARVA. Verification is performed in two steps: KeY first partially proves the data-oriented part of the specification, simplifying the specification which is then passed on to LARVA to check at runtime for the remaining parts of the specification including the control-oriented aspects. We show the applicability of our approach on two case studies.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLCen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectComputer software -- Verificationen_GB
dc.subjectAspect-oriented programmingen_GB
dc.subjectComputer software -- Testingen_GB
dc.subjectAutonomous distributed systemsen_GB
dc.subjectComputer network architecturesen_GB
dc.subjectComputer software -- Developmenten_GB
dc.subjectReal-time data processingen_GB
dc.subjectComputer securityen_GB
dc.titleVerifying data- and control-oriented properties combining static and runtime verification : theory and toolsen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holderen_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10703-017-0274-y-
dc.publication.titleFormal Methods in System Designen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacICTCS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fmsd2017.pdf996.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.