Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2551
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-22T11:32:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-22T11:32:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/2551 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Important information regarding spatial resolution can be ob- tained from the daily uniformity quality control test performed on a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanner using a cylindrical 68Ge phantom. This information can be used to assess scanner spatial resolution over time and to pro- vide multicenter clinical trials with further data for comparing scanners to ensure inter-center image quality. Objectives: To compare two methods for obtaining spatial resolution estimates from the daily uniformity quality control image of a cylindrical 68Ge phantom and to investigate the short and long term repeatability and robustness to small changes in acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Research Design: The value of spatial resolution obtained for each of two scanners (GE Discovery 690 and Philips Gemini TF) using the NEMA NU2 (2007) protocol was used as a reference value for comparison to those obtained from the trial methods. Of the two methods investigated, one included applying Fourier analysis to a transaxial image of the cylindrical 68Ge phantom, and the other applying an edge spread function to a coronal image slice from the same phantom acquisition. Results and Conclusions: Using the Discovery 690's daily quality control pa- rameters, the Fourier analysis method gave a spatial resolution estimate of 5.39 0.09 mm, whilst the edge spread function method gave 9.67 0.47 mm. Both methods were found to be repeatable and robust. They were also found to be sensitive to changes in acquisition and reconstruction parameters, and degrada- tion in scanner spatial resolution. The Fourier analysis technique was found to be independent of position in the FOV, and dependent on count density. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Tomography, Emission | en_GB |
dc.subject | Image processing | en_GB |
dc.subject | Radiography, Medical | en_GB |
dc.title | An implementation of a quality assurance method using a cylindrical 68GE Phantom for measuring spatial resolution in PET | en_GB |
dc.type | masterThesis | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Malta | en_GB |
dc.publisher.department | Faculty of Health. Department of Communication Therapy | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | N/A | en_GB |
dc.contributor.creator | Bickle, Jean Mikhail | |
Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - FacHSc - 2014 Dissertations - FacHScMP - 2014 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
14MSMP22.pdf Restricted Access | 15.38 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.