Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/26583
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShi, Chenyu-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Jiapan-
dc.contributor.authorAzzopardi, George-
dc.contributor.authorMeijer, Joost M.-
dc.contributor.authorJonkman, Marcel F.-
dc.contributor.authorPetkov, Nicolai-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-08T11:00:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-08T11:00:45Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationShi C., Guo J., Azzopardi G., Meijer J. M., Jonkman M. F., & Petkov N. (2015). Automatic differentiation of u- and n-serrated patterns in direct immunofluorescence images. In G. Azzopardi, & N. Petkov (Eds.), Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. CAIP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9256 (pp. 513-521). Springer Cham.en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn9783319231914-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/26583-
dc.descriptionThis is a Conference paper presented by the authors at the CAiP 2015; 16th International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, held in Malta from the 2 to 4 September, 2015. We wish to thank the photographer and data manager of the dermatology department of UMCG for their valuable help.en_GB
dc.description.abstractEpidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease of the skin. Manual u- and n-serrated patterns analysis in direct immunofluorescence (DIF) images is used in medical practice to differentiate EBA from other forms of pemphigoid. The manual analysis of serration patterns in DIF images is very challenging, mainly due to noise and lack of training of the immunofluorescence (IF) microscopists. There are no automatic techniques to distinguish these two types of serration patterns. We propose an algorithm for the automatic recognition of such a disease. We first locate a region where u- and n-serrated patterns are typically found. Then, we apply a bank of B-COSFIRE filters to the identified region of interest in the DIF image in order to detect ridge contours. This is followed by the construction of a normalized histogram of orientations. Finally, we classify an image by using the nearest neighbors algorithm that compares its normalized histogram of orientations with all the images in the dataset. The best results that we achieve on the UMCG publicly available data set is 84.6% correct classification, which is comparable to the results of medical experts.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectComputer visionen_GB
dc.subjectPattern recognition systemsen_GB
dc.subjectSkin -- Diseasesen_GB
dc.titleAutomatic differentiation of u- and n-serrated patterns in direct immunofluorescence imagesen_GB
dc.typebookParten_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacICTAI



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.