Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/27022
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Ian M.-
dc.contributor.authorWootton, Zac-
dc.contributor.authorPedmason, Pille-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-20T14:00:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-20T14:00:18Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationThornton, I. M., Wootton, Z., & Pedmason, P. (2014). Matching biological motion at extreme distances. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 13, 1-18.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/27022-
dc.description.abstractThe goal of the current paper was to determine the maximum distance at which an actor could be placed so that an observer would still be able to interpret their behavior. Although we know a great deal about the limits of action perception, particularly through studies of biological motion processing, this question of distance has not been previously documented. We began by reviewing the sizes of point-light figures used in 100 previous studies of biological motion. We found that with an average figure height of 6.68 visual angle, actors were effectively 15 m from the observer, assuming average physical height of 1.75 m. No previous studies had explicitly examined extreme distances. Here, we introduce a new matching task in which we systematically varied the apparent distance of point-light figures relative to a fixed viewing position by manipulating size. Our results suggest that a variety of human actions could potentially be interpreted up to 1000 m away, a distance at which a human figure would subtend only 0.18 visual angle in height. Dynamic figures could be interpreted at further distances than static figures (Experiment 1), and upright figures were similarly processed more efficiently than inverted figures (Experiment 2). We discuss these findings in the context of the processing mechanisms thought to underlie action perception and suggest that the ability to match actions at extreme distance is another example of the robust nature of biological motion processing.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectRecognition (Psychology)en_GB
dc.subjectMotion perception (Vision)en_GB
dc.subjectVisionen_GB
dc.titleMatching biological motion at extreme distancesen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/14.3.13-
dc.publication.titleJournal of Visionen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacMKSCS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Matching_biological_motion_at_extreme_distances_2014.pdf752.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.