Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28397
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Buhagiar, Daniel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sant, Tonio | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bugeja, Marvin K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-28T07:11:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-28T07:11:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Buhagiar, D., Sant, T., & Bugeja, M. (2016). A comparison of two pressure control concepts for hydraulic offshore wind turbines. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 138(8), 081007. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/28397 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Current research in offshore wind turbines is proposing a novel concept of using seawater-based hydraulics for large-scale power transmission and centralized electrical generation. The objective of this paper is to investigate the control of such an open-loop circuit, where a fixed line pressure is desirable for the sake of efficiency and stability. Pressure control of the open-loop hydraulic circuit presents an interesting control challenge due to the highly fluctuating flow rate along with the nonlinear behavior of the variable-area orifice used by the pressure controller. The present analysis is limited to a single turbine and an open-loop hydraulic line with a variable-area orifice at the end. A controller is proposed which uses a combination of feed-forward compensation for the nonlinear part along with a feedback loop for correcting any errors resulting from inaccuracies in the compensator model. A numerical model of the system under investigation is developed in order to observe the behavior of the controller and the advantages of including the feedback loop. An in-depth analysis is undertaken, including a sensitivity study of the compensator accuracy and a parametric analysis of the actuator response time. Finally, a Monte Carlo analysis was carried out in order to rank the proposed controller in comparison to a simple feed-forward controller and a theoretical optimally tuned controller. Results indicate an advantageous performance of the proposed method of feedback with feed-forward compensation, particularly its ability to maintain a stable line pressure in the face of high parameter uncertainty over a wide range of operating conditions, even with a relatively slow actuation system. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Hydraulic engineering -- Equipment and supplies | en_GB |
dc.subject | Hydraulic motors | en_GB |
dc.subject | Wind turbines | en_GB |
dc.subject | Wind power | en_GB |
dc.subject | Offshore wind power plants | en_GB |
dc.title | A comparison of two pressure control concepts for hydraulic offshore wind turbines | en_GB |
dc.type | article | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | peer-reviewed | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1115/1.4033104 | - |
dc.publication.title | Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME | en_GB |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly Works - FacEngME Scholarly Works - FacEngSCE |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A_Comparison_of_Two_Pressure_Control_Concepts_for_Hydraulic_Offshore_Wind_Turbines_2016.pdf Restricted Access | 1.85 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.