Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-09T07:58:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-09T07:58:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/28914-
dc.descriptionLL.D.en_GB
dc.description.abstractOver the years, the definition of Permanent Establishment (“PE”) found under the OECD Convention has undergone a number of significant changes in order to keep up with evolving trends, in furtherance of its original scope and function. This concept has allowed states to tax the significant presence of a non-resident enterprise within its jurisdiction. However, in the recent years the digitisation of the economy has placed substantial strain on the PE concept. The definition of PE found in Article 5 of the OECD Convention is based upon traditional business models which differ greatly from the business models found in the digital economy. Due to the latter’s unique characteristics, the definition provided is no longer capable of encapsulating the significant presence of an enterprise within another state; something that is largely attributable to the definition’s reliance on physical presence. Over the years, the OECD has attempted to develop the PE notion in order to make it compatible with economic realities and to provide a definition which is better suited for the digital economy. The digital economy provides legislators with an ever-changing landscape and attempting to establish a PE definition which fits all the current business models in play, whilst being flexible enough to encompass the possible future business models which might emerge, is seemingly impossible. However, it seems clear that it is no longer possible to regulate the digital economy and the regular economy by using the same set of rules and practices. The concept will continue to be efficient in allocating taxing rights to source states in the context of traditional business models however, it cannot be considered as being an appropriate way of taxing a nexus in the context of the digital economy. The OECD attempted to create a new scenario through which taxing rights would be allocated to the source country, as opposed to the residence country. Similar measures have also been taken at national level. Whilst the PE concept is not applicable to the digital economy, source based taxation itself remains relevant.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectInternational business enterprises -- Taxation -- Law and legislationen_GB
dc.subjectInternational business enterprises -- Taxation -- Law and legislation -- OECD countriesen_GB
dc.subjectDouble taxationen_GB
dc.subjectElectronic commerce -- Law and legislationen_GB
dc.titleThe notion of permanent establishment : developments in the context of the digital economyen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorFenech Conti, Nicola-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2017
Dissertations - FacLawPub - 2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
17LLD059.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.