Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2900
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-14T10:00:01Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-14T10:00:01Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/2900-
dc.descriptionB. ACCTY. (HONS)en_GB
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The study aims to establish the extent to which Big Four, Medium Non-Big-Four and Small Non-Big-Four Audit Firms adjust their planned level of audit work to reflect the result obtained from their preliminary risk assessments. This is achieved by assessing the interrelationships among engagement-level, account-level and assertion-level risks. Moreover, the study examines the frequency with which audit firms modify their audit plans to be in keeping witht. the dynamic risk assessment facors Design: These objectives are achieved by examining quantitative data elicited from the working papers of 127 varied audit clients of 12 Big Four and Non-Big-Four Audit Firms. Semi-structured interviews were also held with two Partners and a n Audit Manager, each belonging to a different type of Audit Firm. Findings: The study revealed that, unlike Big Four and Medium Non-Big-Four Audit Firms, wherein moderate, statistical associations prevail between their risk assessments and audit plans, the planning dimensions of Small Non-Big-Four Firms are not principally risk-adjusted. This, therefore, indicates that Small Firm's audit plans are possibly driven by other salient factors, as the i availabilty of staff and the audit fees charged. Further analysis established that Small Audit Firms conduct a considerable amount of audit work even when clients' business risk assessments are low. Meanwhile, it has been noted that Big Four Firms are the most conscientious when it comes to ensuring that experienced personnel devote more time to audits where clients' business risks and fraud risks are deemed high. It has finally been concluded that, over the past decade, the plans and programs of Big Four and Medium Non-Big-Four Audit Firms have been mod alternative tests which are more esponsive to the clients' overall risk assessments, thereby making for more fficient and e re ffective audits. Value: It is hoped that this study's conclusions and recommendations will generate further developments in the area, particularly with respect to: providing more active support to Small Non-Big-Four Audit Firms; devoting ore attention to fraud risks; and doubling audit firms' efforts to work wiser ather than mr longer hours.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectAudit firms -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectRisk assessment -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleRisk assessments in Maltese external audit planning : an evaluationen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy. Department of Accountancyen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorBezzina, Charis-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacEma - 2010
Dissertations - FacEMAAcc - 2010

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10BACC011.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.