Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29222
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEffendi, Kharisya Ayu-
dc.contributor.authorDisman, Disman-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-16T10:12:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-16T10:12:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationEffendi, K. A., & Disman, D. (2017). Liquidity risk : comparison between Islamic and conventional banking. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2A), 308-318.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn11082976-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/29222-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of micro-economy or bank-specific to the liquidity risk in Islamic and conventional banks. The data in this study using secondary data consists of 20 Islamic banks and 12 conventional banks obtained from seven countries, namely Albania, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Malaysia, Dubai, Qatar and Indonesia from 2009 to 2015. This research method is based on quantitative techniques using panel data regression. The results showed that in the Islamic and conventional bank found the best model is the fixed effect model. The variables that affect the liquidity risk in Islamic banks are the CAR, FEXP, FLP and NPF. While the variables that affect liquidity risk in conventional banks are FEXP, FLP, NPL and ROA. In Islamic banking NIM, ROA and SIZE does not affect the liquidity risk, and CAR, NIM and SIZE not affect the liquidity risk in Conventional banks.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Piraeus. International Strategic Management Associationen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBanks and banking -- Islamic countriesen_GB
dc.subjectBanking law (Islamic law)en_GB
dc.subjectBank liquidity -- Islamic countriesen_GB
dc.subjectRisk management -- Islamic countriesen_GB
dc.subjectBanks and banking -- Religious aspects -- Islamen_GB
dc.titleLiquidity risk : comparison between Islamic and conventional bankingen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.publication.titleEuropean Research Studies Journalen_GB
Appears in Collections:European Research Studies Journal, Volume 20, Issue 2, Part A

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liquidity_Risk_Comparison_between_Islamic_and_Conventional_Banking_2017.pdf421.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.