Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29312
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-18T09:27:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-18T09:27:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/29312 | - |
dc.description | LL.B | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | The following study shall focus on the obscure notion of possession and control when cause of action arises under Article 742D of the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure. The notion has been understood differently throughout varying jurisdictions. This term paper aims to discover the principle interpretation of the concept of possession and control as referred to under Article 742D. The term paper examines Article 742D, while focusing on the true understanding of the action in rem and the requisites of Article 742D in order for the arrest of a vessel to be deemed successful. The analysis will further observe the notion of possession and control and the manner it was dealt with in our Courts prior to the introduction of Article 742D in the Code of Organization and Civil Procedure. The term paper inspects the process of lifting the corporate veil when an action in rem is brought against a ship, and how damages may be compensated when an action in rem is taken against a vessel that was in the control or possession of the relevant person. Due to the fact that Maltese Courts haven’t dealt with the notion upon Article 742D’s establishment in Maltese Law, reference is made to foreign case law to truly comprehend what route the courts would adopt if the concept where to be brought to light in the Maltese Courts. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Actions in rem -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Corporate veil -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Possession (Law) -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.title | The notion of possession and control when cause of action arises under Article 742D of the COCP | en_GB |
dc.type | bachelorThesis | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Malta | en_GB |
dc.publisher.department | Faculty of Laws | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | N/A | en_GB |
dc.contributor.creator | Rizzo Naudi, Marcus Anthony | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - FacLaw - 2017 Dissertations - FacLawCiv - 2017 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
17LLB112.pdf Restricted Access | 835.17 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.