Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29346
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-19T08:10:52Z
dc.date.available2018-04-19T08:10:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/29346
dc.descriptionLL.Ben_GB
dc.description.abstractDriven by the inspirations and direction of its political leaders throughout the past five centuries to generate wealth and live in peace, Malta safeguarded its security by being neutral in potentially emerging wars and also looked for protection from its close allied nations. It is within this scenario that the concept of Neutrality was encrypted in the Constitution of Malta. This term paper aims to determine whether the Maltese Neutrality clause is still relevant today and establish the views of local experts in the field of Neutrality from a legal and political perspective. It further aims at recommending how the Neutrality clause can be amended to be more relevant in the current circumstances and in the foreseen future. Through an in-depth literature review and qualitative primary research data collection in the form of interviews with two prominent and experienced Politicians, a Legal Expert and a Maltese Historian, the term paper outcomes reveal that the term Neutrality as enacted in the Constitution of Malta is still relevant and should not be revoked. Yet, the research concludes that the legal context of the clause has never been tested thoroughly and the term "superpowers" is considered as obsolete due. It is therefore recommended that politicians, legal experts, historians and the general public in Malta start the process of re-visiting the key terms used to interpret the word "superpowers". Moreover, the Article 1 (3), should be rephrased and amended to reflect the current scenario as Malta is part of the EU where information and communication technology is a dominant factor and where military powers, warfare and nations' geographical boundaries have changed significantly. Finally, Members of Parliament should explore the possibility of binding the same Parliament to review the Constitution every two decades to reflect the international and local scenarios of the time.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectConstitutional law -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectNeutrality -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectMilitary law -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleThe relevance of the neutrality clause of the Maltese Constitution after the fall of the Berlin wall and in light of a new cold waren_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorSpiteri, Jessica
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2017
Dissertations - FacLawPub - 2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
17LLB121.pdf
  Restricted Access
753.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.