Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36151
Title: The twelve : another perspective: John 6, 67-71
Authors: Collins, Raymond F.
Keywords: Apocryphal Gospels -- Criticism, interpretation, etc
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Bible. Minor Prophets
Issue Date: 1989
Publisher: University of Malta. Faculty of Theology
Citation: Collins, R. F. (1989). The twelve : another perspective: John 6, 67-71. Melita Theologica, 40(2), 95-109.
Abstract: Almost from the beginning of Christian history it has been recognized that the fourth gospel is radically different from the other three gospels in the New Testament. During Patristic times, the difference was epitomized in the characterization of the fourth gospel as "the spiritual gospel" and the choice of the eagle as a symbol to represent its author who was, as it were, considered capable of soaring to the heights of heaven. In the early years of the historical critical era, the difference between the fourth gospel and the others was summed up in the characterization of Matthew, Mark, and Luke as "the synoptic gospels," a category from which the fourth gospel was obviously - and for good reason - excluded. The difference between the Synoptics and the fourth gospel received symbolic expression in the printed synopses, beginning with Griesbach's work in 1774, which contained only the first three of the canonical gospels.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/36151
Appears in Collections:MT - Volume 40, Issue 2 - 1989
MT - Volume 40, Issue 2 - 1989

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MT,_40(2)_-_A2.pdf720.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.